Category Archives: Observe & Ponder

Iranian Singer Sentenced to 74 Lashes


Parastoo Ahmadi (Left) and Googoosh (Right)

Iranian singer Parastoo Ahmadi was sentenced to 74 lashes for livestreaming an online concert without wearing a hijab. The severe ruling underscores ongoing restrictions on artistic expression and women’s rights in Iran.

The date of Ahmadi’s lashing, mandated by the Morality Police, has not been officially announced because her sentence is under appeal, though it is unlikely to be reversed.

The sentence, handed down on June 18, 2026, stems from a December 2024 livestream concert on Ahmadi’s YouTube channel. The 29-year-old Ahmadi sang a patriotic anthem without wearing a hijab, a practice banned under Iran’s strict laws.

In addition to the flogging, Ahmadi faces a two-year ban on leaving the country and a two-year ban on engaging in any artistic activities.

Fatemeh Shams, a professor of Persian Literature at the University of Pennsylvania, wrote on X: “Peace is not merely the silencing of missile sounds or the subsiding of bombardment flames. Peace finds meaning only when the bodies of women and innocent protesters are no longer fields for unrestrained violence; when whips, torture, and nooses are no longer tools of governance. True and lasting peace becomes possible only when no woman is branded a criminal for working, studying, singing, or choosing her own lifestyle; and when no innocent human is consigned to dark prison cells and gallows for the crime of protesting, demanding justice, or expressing an opinion.”

The Iranian-British actor Nazanin Boniadi said: “The sentencing of singer Parastoo Ahmadi to flogging for the simple act of singing publicly without a hijab is a stark reminder that, despite talk in Washington of a ‘new regime’ in Iran, the Islamic Republic’s machinery of repression remains unchanged.”

The Iranian actor Setareh Maleki, who was forced into exile after starring in Mohammad Rasoulof’s Oscar-nominated film The Seed of the Sacred Fig, said: “When I watched the video of Parastoo Ahmadi’s concert, it reignited the spirit of resistance in me. For days, I kept watching the videos over and over again, and I felt immensely proud of Parastoo.”

Since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, male singers face heavy censorship and must obtain official permits for public performances, while women have been prohibited from singing solo for mixed-gender audiences in public. Women are permitted to sing only in groups or choirs, or for female-only audiences. Singers must have their lyrics and music approved by the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance, and the censorship and licensing process in Iran is highly stringent.

The sentencing of Ahmadi brought back memories of Googoosh, an Iranian Azerbaijani singer and actress who was wildly popular in the 1960s and 1970s.

Googoosh, a Turkish name meaning “Swan Bird,” was as famous in Iran as Elvis was in the United States.

Her music ranged from upbeat pop to emotional ballads, and she was often compared to Édith Piaf. Googoosh also starred in more than 25 movies, including the most commercially successful Iranian film of all time.

Then came the Iranian Revolution in 1979, which forever changed her life. During that time, 29-year-old Googoosh fled Iran and settled in Los Angeles.

For personal reasons, a few months later she returned to Tehran despite warnings that the incoming extremist regime would likely imprison or execute her. Upon her return, the new theocratic government arrested her, barred her from singing or performing, banned her music and movies, stripped her of her passport, and imposed a 21-year state-enforced silence on her.

During Mohammad Khatami’s presidency, after her 21-year sentence, she was somehow allowed to tour outside Iran. The Googoosh Comeback Tour was a series of concerts that began in July 2000, when she was 50 years old.

When I was the Publisher of World Press Review Magazine, I was offered press tickets to her historic sold-out New York concert at Madison Square Garden on August 26, 2000.

The concert scene was surreal as Googoosh was greeted by more than ten thousand cheering fans, many of them Iranian refugees who had last heard her sing in pre-revolutionary Iran and were openly weeping.

Googoosh has lived in exile and toured ever since, dedicating her life to keeping Iranian culture and music alive for audiences worldwide.

Oh, if only this was an option for Parastoo Ahmadi.

The Seven Minute Theory


Yesterday, I came across the meme above, which suggests that the human brain remains active for about seven minutes after death, replaying its most cherished memories.

The meme tugged at me in a way I hadn’t anticipated.

Seven minutes.

What if my most treasured memories, people, or events could replay in my mind as I left this glorious earth behind?

An instant replay at death.

I found the concept cathartically soothing and deeply reflective.

Unable to get the meme out of my head, I went on my usual Google search-rampage for more information.

According to my research, the “seven minutes” phenomenon stems from observations of the dying process during near-death experiences. When the heart stops, blood and oxygen stop flowing to the brain, but neurons don’t die immediately.

Studies on animals and recordings from the brains of dying humans have shown brief, intense bursts of electrical activity, known as gamma waves, during the brain’s shutdown phase.

Some scientists have observed brief bursts of brain activity just moments after death, resembling patterns associated with memory or dreaming.

The “seven minutes” concept holds that this final surge of neural activity—caused by oxygen deprivation and a flood of neurotransmitters—can trigger a dreamlike state or sudden, vivid, and fragmented recall of memories.

Other scientists are adamant that a seven-minute duration is questionable, arguing that the brain retains residual electrical energy for less than seven minutes before irreversible damage occurs. Yet they also acknowledge that the duration can vary depending on the circumstances.

The bottom line? No one really knows.

Neural activity after death is an unfounded mystery, and there is no way to know whether the seven-minute instant replay claim is true.

I know nothing about the validity of consciousness during the dying process, but I was intrigued by the possibility.

There is no conclusive, hard scientific evidence that the brain remains alive for seven minutes or for any length of time after death.

Yet I couldn’t stop fantasizing about it.

And hoping for it.

For my purposes, and at my age, the mere thought that at death, instead of being terrified right before dying, there is a possible miraculous opportunity to experience pure joy for seven long minutes stuck with me as I tried to sleep last night.

In my final moments, I would love an instant replay of the people and the memories I cherish most.

Who wouldn’t?

Which then prompted me to ask:

If I had only seven minutes to relive the best moments of my life, which memories would I choose?

Whom or what would I see?

Whose laughter would I hear?

Who would be holding me close?

What memory would flash before my eyes in the fleeting minutes before I faded into the unknown?

I was sleepless in New York, so I had countless hours to replay countless moments with countless precious somebodies in my head.

The idea of my brain replaying my best memories in those final moments before my death was as eerie as it was comforting.

I began instant-replaying some of my most glorious memories.

That night, we ran through the dark in R.I., then rolled around together in fits of laughter.

The one who loved snails and the one who preferred trucks and GI Joes.

The adoration in his eyes as we held hands and climbed the snowy hill to sled all the way down.

The way he pressed his beaming face against the boards of the ice rink when he saw me.

Her excitement as she told me that one of those adorable puppies was mine.

She preferred “DIAPES!”

Making roses together from tissues and a bobby pin.

Regrets, he had a few.

The goose poop was “everyway!”

The way she called out, “Teh? Teh?”

He was only one when he looked up at me as if no one else were in the room.

The saga of Pee Pants.

The big love I felt when he jumped into that puddle, which covered him in mud, and then he wrapped his arms around me ever so tightly.

Once upon a time, there was AAA.

I winced, but lovingly, as she hurdled over the pews at the prayer service, exposing her diaper-wadded tights.

How peacefully he slept in my arms for hours and hours.

The vow we made never to reveal what happened in the hotel room with all of us girls.

Our constant texting during Storm Sandy continued until both our phones died.

He was adamant about “Not even in a tunnel.”

Her French lilt as she lovingly called me “Mon petit chou.”

The laughter that poured out of the two of them as I raced them through the snow in the pitch-black night on that neon toboggan.

The way he comforted me when I was at my lowest point.

The dozen roses he bought me with all of his allowance money for Mother’s Day.

How she looked forward to my reading the newspaper to her every day after school.

That day, I washed my hair in the rain.

They were all part of my seven-minute moments, and I didn’t even have to die to recall any of them!

I thought about the treasured people who had passed through my life and the countless stupendously joyful memories, many of which I had long since forgotten.

And honestly, the memories were so vivid, and I felt so present. And, surprisingly, they didn’t make me sad. They made me ecstatically happy.

There were so many people I hadn’t thought of in years. Displaced moments, scattered memories—some so sweet that I was shocked I had forgotten them.

I relived times in my life that never made it into my highlight reel, even though many of those moments defined my entire persona.

A random meme about seven minutes of replay at death was the reason I spent all night reliving many of my favorite memories of so many people I loved and still love.

Then I started wondering…

I wondered whether so many of those I thought about last night will ever know how deeply I care about them.

And I vowed to tell as many as I could.

I wondered whether those who now exist only in a paradise I hope to one day join know that I think about them all the time and that they will always hold a special place in my heart.

I wondered about those who are still here but not with me—whether they know how much I love them and, if they do, whether they care.

I wondered whether I would someday be part of someone’s seven minutes.

If only.

Dream Interpretation


I had three dreams this week, but I only remembered one sentence from each.

After each dream, the process was the same: I awoke, said the sentence aloud, and then scribbled it down in the dark.

February 23: Stuck in the valley of no.

February 25: She looked beyond all of it and said goodbye.

February 27: But the girl is always in there.

As I read and reread the three sentences this morning, I concluded that, in addition to dreams, they were also a collection of ideological musings and a dialogue between my conscious and unconscious mind.

Which got me thinking about Sigmund Freud, Carl Jung, and Teri Schure’s theories on dreams.

In the early 1970s, I bought a used copy of Sigmund Freud’s The Interpretation of Dreams, a 1955 English translation. I have read and reread it countless times and still consult it whenever I analyze a dream.

The book, published in 1899, examines why we dream and why dreams matter in our psychological lives. In it, Freud presents his theory of the unconscious mind through dream analysis, arguing that dreams are disguised fulfillments of repressed wishes, often originating in the personal, repressed unconscious rooted in childhood experiences. Freud distinguishes between the manifest (remembered) and latent (hidden) dream content, using dream interpretation as a key to understanding the unconscious.

A few years after buying Freud’s book, I bought Man and His Symbols by Carl Jung. In his book, Jung argues that the world of the unconscious mind is as vital and as true a part of us as the conscious mind, and that both communicate through our dreams—those personal, integral expressions of our deepest selves.

Jung’s book and theories differ from Freud’s in that the concept of the unconscious mind, as revealed through dream analysis, has nothing to do with repressed desires or wishes.

According to Jung, dreams are unvarnished, spontaneous, and random messages from the unconscious that aim to balance the psyche, promote wholeness, and serve as a counterweight to the conscious mind and its attitudes. As such, dreams serve as a vehicle for communication and can help the dreamer integrate the conscious and the unconscious. This process involves accepting, respecting, accommodating, and learning to live in peace with both our conscious and unconscious selves.

Freud believed that dreams served as a façade, concealing deep, dark, suppressed secrets. Freud’s approach focused on past events from the personal unconscious and aimed to decode or make sense of repressed trauma. Freud also believed that dreams have a direct connection to past experiences.

Jung believed dreams were future-oriented, direct, and honest representations of the unconscious and that they provided fodder for conscious attitudes and were instrumental in resolving and balancing unfinished emotional issues.

I found the diverging opinions between their genius dream theories, as well as the personal relationship between Freud and Jung, fascinating.

When they first met in 1906, Freud, nearly twenty years older than Jung, was already well established and regarded as the “king” or “father” of psychoanalysis.

Born in 1856, Freud was the established mentor, while Jung, born in 1875, was considered the younger, rising colleague—often referred to as the “crown prince” or “son” of psychoanalysis.

Because of the age difference, their relationship often mirrored a father-son dynamic until their professional split around 1913, after which they never spoke again, leading to the development of two distinct schools of thought.

Jung felt that Freud’s emphasis on sexuality was too narrow and limiting. Rather than merely masking repressed desires, Jung believed that dreams used symbolic language to reveal personal truths, highlight mental and physical health issues, and offer guidance.

Freud respected Jung’s intellect but was annoyed by his refusal to serve as a “rubber stamp” for Freud’s theories. Some theorists argue that Freud and Jung parted ways because of homosexual feelings that destabilized their relationship.

I have always been skeptical of the reasoning behind Freud and Jung’s view that their theories were irreconcilable. So perhaps it is no surprise to me that the why and how of my dream process include elements of both theories.

There is a concept called “unfinished thoughts,” which is another theory about repressed (unconscious) and suppressed (conscious) memory. Every time our brain tries to repress or suppress intrusive thoughts, lingering worries, traumatic experiences, or anything the conscious or unconscious mind has not resolved, those experiences are encoded in memory. These memories and unwanted thoughts we try so hard to suppress and repress often resurface in our dreams, a phenomenon known as “dream rebound.”

Like Sigmund Freud, if I wake from a dream and remember it, I write it down so I can later try to make sense of its meaning, and I always add it to a Word document titled “Dreams” on my computer. On one eerie occasion, I had an immensely troubling nightmare, only to learn months later that someone I once loved had passed away on the same day I had the dream.

Like Carl Jung, I believe that my conscious and unconscious are distinct yet interacting parts of a single, unified psyche. I also believe that my dreams are messages from my unconscious that often influence my conscious life.

My dreams are complex and detailed and seem to last for hours, even though I know most dreams typically last between five and thirty minutes, and that it is possible to have four to seven dreams per night.

When my dreams aren’t long and drawn out, they often manifest as a single sentence. Or maybe they are long and drawn out, but when I wake up, the only thing I retain is a one-liner from the dream.

Here are some key concepts I have learned from Jung and Freud, along with my own repressed, suppressed, and unfinished thoughts about dreams:

  • My dreams often serve as a window into my unconscious mind, revealing my repressed hopes, desires, fears, and conflicts. My daytime rumination about stressful, negative, or unfinished life events manifests in my sleep.
  • Some of my dreams, disguised as fulfillments of my unconscious, repressed thoughts and memories, are often violent and aggressive. Thoughts I have intentionally and consciously suppressed or blocked out during the day tend to haunt and taunt me in my dreams.
  • My dreams are a continuation of my waking thoughts, in which my attempts to resolve, process, or make sense of unpleasant situations remain unfinished.

Like Freud, I believe my dreams often reflect my childhood experiences and help me process unmet emotional needs, anxieties, or traumas that were never properly addressed. For Freud, the truest interpretation of a dream must help the dreamer uncover hidden, repressed, and usually infantile wishes.

Like Jung, I believe my dreams often contain powerful, universal symbols that directly relate to my current life, emotions, and waking situation, and that they bridge the conscious and unconscious. For Jung, the truest interpretation of a dream must help the dreamer move forward in their life and personal development.

Circling back to the three sentences from my dreams, I see more clearly what they are trying to tell me. I also recognize distinct elements in them that Freud and Jung strongly believed in.

And when I put my three dream fragments together, they make all the sense in the world, from both a conscious and unconscious perspective:

Stuck in the valley of no, she looked beyond all of it and said goodbye. But the girl is always in there.

Does Truth Exist?

Lisa, a Facebook friend of mine, recently posted a cartoon that said: “There are two sides to every story. Mine, and the one I’m not going to tell you about.”

My response was: “I always say, there are three sides to every story. Yours, mine, and the truth.”

Estelle, a Facebook friend of Lisa’s, countered with, “The question is who provides the truth?”

I had no response for Estelle because her question made me realize that there are innumerable sides to every story.  And my “Yours, mine, and the truth” theory was hackneyed, naïve, and untrue, which is why I’ll most likely never use it again.

Instead of responding to Estelle, I took the easy way out and replied with a “Thumbs Up” emoji.

Thumbs Up? That’s all I had?

I couldn’t get Estelle’s question out of my mind, and she had me thinking about truth for a hot minute, but then, as usual, life took over.

That was until this afternoon, when I started streaming His & Hers on Netflix. Literally minutes into the psychological thriller, the narrator reflected on the many sides of a story by stating, “There are at least two sides to every story: Yours and mine. Ours and theirs. His and hers. Which means someone is always lying.”

And there it was: Truth can’t be trusted.

Truth can be uncovered, discovered, or often invented.

How many times have we confused truth with belief?

And how many times are those beliefs false?

And how many of us hold onto beliefs that we know aren’t true?

What is it about truth that makes it so elusive and untrustworthy?

When I went back on Facebook to respond to Estelle with more than a perfunctory “Thumbs Up,” about who provides the truth, I saw that Lisa had already done so with: “That’s what we are all trying to figure out!”

I couldn’t have said it better myself.