2025 Word of the Year

The editors at Merriam-Webster have chosen SLOP as their 2025 Word of the Year.

The selection process for word of the year goes like this:

The editors review and analyze spikes and search data on top words as well as verbal usage. (DUH.)

But SLOP? What the ….?

My first thought was gooey, slimy, yucky, wet, brown stuff that nobody wants to touch, let alone eat. Blech.

But then I asked myself: why would a word from the 1700s/1800s make it to the top spot in 2025?

So of course, I googled the heck out of it.

Here are but a few of the new and improved definitions of SLOP:

Digital content of low quality. (I call this “news that stupid people use,” but okay.)

Propaganda and fake news that incite people to do irrational things. (I call this “news that stupid people use,” but okay.)

Talking cat and dog clips. (I’ll admit, I’ve enjoyed my fair share of talking animal banter.)

Artificial Intelligence that is chock full of misinformation, deepfakes, and copyright infringement. (I call this one downright dangerous, and it scares the bejesus out of me.)

And then there are the SLOP variations:

SLOPTIMIZED: Content or an algorithm that prioritizes the mass production of SLOP for maximum operating profit. (WAKE UP PEOPLE! It always comes down to the almighty dollar.)

 WORKSLOP: Reports that waste coworkers’ time. (I TOTALLY agree with this one.)

SLIP-SLOP: Careless or hurried work. (YEP. I’ve been personally victimized by this one. Time and time again.)

SLOPAHOLIC: A sloppy drinker. (YEP. I’ve been personally victimized by this one. Time and time again.)

RETROSLOP: Failed attempts at loading retro-style content or games, leading to technical issues that prevent the game from running smoothly. (STUPID.)

 FRIENDSLOP: Online game platforms played by someone with “friends” working toward a common virtual universe goal that often costs them (or their parents) thousands of dollars. (STUPID. And expensive.)

SLOP-ROT: A term for content perceived to cause a loss of intellectual or critical thinking skills due to its inane or moronic nature. (IGNORAMOUSLY STUPID.)

SLOPAGANDA: Propaganda disguised as entertainment. (Is anyone besides me seeing a frightening brain drain theme here?)

According to Merriam-Webster, the words below have defined the last 10 years:

2024: POLARIZATION

2023: AUTHENTIC

2022: GASLIGHTING

2021: VACCINE

2020: PANDEMIC

2019: THEY

2018: JUSTICE

2017: FEMINISM

2016: SURREAL

2015: ISM

Be a Lamp

Every human soul is a divine lamp (Proverbs 20:27)

Tonight, as I light the Chanukah menorah, I’m going to make a promise to myself to be a lamp. I’m weary from all the hateful antisemitic darkness and tired of all the malcontents who try to stamp out my light. And somewhere along the way, the haters succeeded in dimming it. As each candle wick unfurls its glow over the next eight nights, I will pray for a new way forward, because I need to be a lamp. We all need to be a lamp.

Let us globalize the light.

Stop Blaming the Albatross

How many times have I heard that he, she, or it is an albatross around someone’s neck?

The image of a dead bird hanging heavily around someone’s neck always makes me wince a little, primarily because the albatross is unfairly vilified and targeted by those who need to place their angst on something or someone besides themselves.

I often equate the albatross to another target who is also falsely accused of causing others distress or difficulty: the black sheep.

I have a soft spot for black sheep, most probably because I was called one for a good part of my younger life by family members who were supposed to love and protect me. I once, shockingly, heard it firsthand from my beloved family member’s best friend at her wedding, to describe me. (Nice to meet you, too.)  At the time, I asked myself, “How is it possible to be her matron of honor and the black sheep at the same time?” I now know that the two were never mutually exclusive.

But I digress.

The albatross has been used and abused as a metaphor for perceived and continuous problems that someone is being forced to carry: a bothersome person, a psychological burden, negative business dealings or situations that have gone awry, and even the result of being rich or famous (boo hoo, poor, entitled you).

I say hail to the albatross.

If you’ve ever read the 1798 poem “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner,” written by Samuel Taylor Coleridge, I don’t see how you would disagree with me that the albatross gets an unfair and untruthful bad rap.

The albatross was clearly the victim in the poem, and the sailor who so callously murdered the bird was the actual villain, which was why the rest of the crew forced him to carry it around his neck. It was the targeted and unwarranted killing of the albatross by the mariner that brought the curse upon the ship, not the bird itself.

“And I had done a hellish thing,
And it would work ’em woe:
For all averred, I had killed the bird
That made the breeze to blow.”

Masters of the sky, albatrosses have the largest wingspan of any other bird, and they can fly for months and even years without landing on solid ground. The Wright brothers’ first gliders were inspired by the albatross’s wing design.

The mighty albatross is capable of covering thousands of miles without so much as flapping their wings, and is known to travel over 10,000 miles in a single flight. They can even sleep while gliding, and land on the ocean’s surface only to hunt and feed on floating organisms, which is why they often follow fishing boats.

Albatrosses are remarkable for their exceptional flight ability, monogamous relationships, and devoted parenting.

Many albatrosses spend their first few years of life at sea, only returning to solid ground to breed. The male albatross shares a significant responsibility in raising their chicks and plays a crucial role in their survival. They are monogamous creatures and faithful partners who stay on land solely to father and raise their young. Some albatross species maintain their familial bonds for life, including their chicks.

While the poem’s narrative has given the albatross a negative connotation, it has long been a symbol of good fortune, and ancient tales extol their ability to bring good luck to seafarers. And yet, the albatross is consistently labeled as a heavy burden and a source of guilt impossible to be rid of.

In Coleridge’s epic poem, the mariner describes the psychological burden and the due penance he paid for senselessly killing the albatross by being forced to wear it around his neck as a reminder and symbol of his sin and guilt—i.e., the albatross did nothing wrong.

“Ah! well a-day! what evil looks
Had I from old and young!
Instead of the cross, the Albatross
About my neck was hung. “

The poem goes on to describe how every crew member on the ship dies except for the mariner. The dead albatross eventually falls off his neck, leaving the mariner forever destined to roam the earth telling the story of his survival. Some interpretations go so far as to claim that the mariner was redeemed, but I don’t see anything redeeming about his evil actions.

I think the mariner got off easy, and his being the sole survivor was grossly unfair. He never got his due. It was the albatross who should have survived.

“He went like one that hath been stunned,
And is of sense forlorn:
A sadder and a wiser man,
He rose the morrow morn.”

The albatross, central to the poem, was merely in the wrong place at the wrong time, and yet it was this innocent and unsuspecting bird that became a scapegoat—a black sheep—in the annals of history.

Frankly, and most unfortunately, I know all too well a thing or two about that.

***

https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/43997/the-rime-of-the-ancient-mariner-text-of-1834

When the World Looks Away


In the summer of 1938, Hitler claimed that the Sudetenland, a border region of Czechoslovakia with a German-speaking majority, needed to be saved by Germany and threatened war if his demand was not met.

On September 30, 1938, the British and French leaders, hoping to avoid a war, agreed to this act of appeasement, officially allowing Germany to annex the Sudetenland, without Czechoslovakian input.

If this illegal and outrageous land grab sounds familiar, well, you know the old saying: “History has a way of repeating itself.”

Less than one year later, on September 1, 1939, Germany invaded Poland. On September 7, 1940, Germany began conducting mass air attacks against British cities, starting with London.

While Hitler was advancing through Europe, Charles Lindbergh and the America First isolation movement believed that there was no American interest in stopping Hitler and that Hitler’s sworn policy to harass and persecute Jews was an internal German issue.

Lindbergh was the leading opposition voice to the U.S. involvement in World War II—until Japan attacked Pearl Harbor and Hitler’s declaration of war against the United States.

The defeat of Hitler and the horrors of Jewish genocide brought about the recognition of the State of Israel through the United Nations Partition Plan in 1947. The Partition Plan proposed to divide Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states, with Jerusalem designated as an international zone.

The Jews agreed, but the Palestinian Arabs and surrounding Arab states (Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq) rejected the plan, leading to the 1948 Arab-Israeli War and the subsequent creation of the State of Israel.

And now, here we are with Russia and its dictator, Putin, invading Ukraine—the first invasion of a sovereign European nation since the end of World War II. Putin’s justification for his Ukrainian land grab was eerily similar to Hitler’s annexation of Czechoslovakia’s Sudetenland.

The terrorist organization Hamas declared war by invading the sovereign state of Israel with a sneak attack, slaughtering men, women, and children, and causing the highest number of Jewish deaths since World War II.

Hamas’s justification for their war against Israel was the rejection of Israel’s existence, to improve its domestic popularity among Palestinians, which had seen some decline due to deteriorating living conditions under its governance in Gaza, and religious fundamentalism.

At a time when Ukraine and Israel are fighting for their very survival, it is shocking that no one has learned from the past and the lessons of World War II.

Instead of standing united against the Russian aggression toward Ukraine and Hamas’s murderous attack and threat to annihilate Israel and its people, isolationists like Tucker Carlson and Candice Owen, along with their sycophants, praise and enable Putin, and disparage Ukraine, the Ukrainians, Israel, and the Jews.

And while Europe has stood steadfast with Ukraine against Russia, most countries have turned their backs on Israel, the Israelis, and the Jewish diaspora by making excuses for the terrorist organization, Hamas.

Both conflicts began with cross-border aggression against internationally recognized sovereign states, which is the most basic violation of international law.

Both of these declarations of war by vicious dictatorships and authoritarian regimes against Ukraine and Israel had a clearly stated goal:  to wipe Ukraine and Israel off the face of the earth.

The terrorist organization Hamas against Israel and the dictator Putin against Ukraine both assert that Israel and Ukraine have no right to exist, and too many around the world agree with these murderous regimes.

The wars in Gaza and Ukraine have affected the world in significant ways, including deepening political divisions and exacerbating political polarization, causing mass protests worldwide.

Both wars have strained the world’s economy through inflation and high aid costs, and have significantly influenced elections, both here in the United States and around the world.

The failure to learn from past mistakes and allowing history to repeat itself is due to factors like insufficient critical thinking, generational gaps in experience, or a lack of comprehensive knowledge about previous events.

The wars against Ukraine and Israel are what happen when so many around the world look away.